IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3549-d1913954.html

Key Challenges to Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Contexts: Insights from Researchers and Practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Corieander Griebel

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Nourou Barry

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
    Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Madison D. Horgan

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
    Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Alison Deviney

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • S. Kathleen Barnhill

    (Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Justin Baker

    (Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Khara Grieger

    (Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability (STEPS) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA
    Genetic Engineering and Society (GES) Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    Department of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
    North Carolina Plant Science Initiative, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly recognized as vital to developing interdisciplinary solutions to complex sustainability problems, such as phosphorus management. At the same time, several challenges and barriers may arise when engaging stakeholders in practice. This study identifies key challenges in engagement and explores how they may be addressed. Using an online survey of 121 researchers and practitioners engaged in sustainability work in the U.S., along with 10 interviewees, data were analyzed using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Key results from this study identify two main sets of challenges and needs, as well as the relationships between them. First, participants identified “top down” challenges to engagement, including limited funding, resources, organizational support, and time, alongside “bottom up” challenges related to recruitment and retention, inclusive representation, trust-building, facilitation skills, and balancing stakeholder expectations. While prior studies have noted important factors and case-specific challenges, this study is the first to systematically document these challenges and needs across a range of fields and highlight interconnections between structural resource limitations and practitioners’ ability to build and sustain meaningful stakeholder relationships. Future research can build on these findings to enhance the field of engagement by advocating for more resources to conduct engagement and developing methods to better assess success of engagement practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Corieander Griebel & Nourou Barry & Madison D. Horgan & Alison Deviney & S. Kathleen Barnhill & Justin Baker & Khara Grieger, 2026. "Key Challenges to Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Contexts: Insights from Researchers and Practitioners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3549-:d:1913954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3549-:d:1913954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.