IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3524-d1913554.html

Low-Carbon Policy and Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Tianyuan Rao

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 451191, China)

  • Heng Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 451191, China)

Abstract

To address escalating climate challenges, China has implemented a multi-tiered low-carbon policy framework aimed at achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, profoundly reshaping firms’ strategic and financial behaviors. Using a panel of Chinese listed firms from 2007 to 2022, this study examines how low-carbon policies affect corporate earnings management choices and the underlying mechanisms. The results show that low-carbon policies significantly restrain accrual-based earnings management while simultaneously promoting real earnings management, indicating a clear substitution effect; these findings remain robust across multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analyses reveal that rising financing costs and enhanced digital transformation induced by low-carbon policies curb accrual-based earnings management, whereas increased financial risk and weakened debt-paying ability stimulate real earnings management. Further heterogeneity analyses suggest that the inhibitory effect on accrual-based earnings management is stronger among firms subject to greater analyst coverage and media scrutiny, while the shift toward real earnings management is more pronounced among firms with weaker profitability and those located in regions with lower innovation capacity. Overall, this study deepens the understanding of the microeconomic consequences of low-carbon policies and provides policy-relevant insights for refining green regulatory frameworks and promoting sustainable corporate development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianyuan Rao & Heng Tan, 2026. "Low-Carbon Policy and Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3524-:d:1913554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3524/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3524/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3524-:d:1913554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.