IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3392-d1910687.html

Analysis of Differences in User Requirements for Child-Friendly Pocket Parks Based on the KANO–QFD Model: A Case Study of Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruoyan Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Jiajie Cao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210000, China)

  • Ruiyuan Jiang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210000, China)

Abstract

In the context of rapid urbanization, pocket parks have become an important component of urban green infrastructure, supporting residents’ daily recreation, health, and well-being. However, existing pocket park designs are largely shaped by adult designers’ perspectives, with children’s needs often inferred or assumed rather than directly investigated. From a sustainability and health-oriented perspective, this study aims to enhance the functionality and user satisfaction of pocket parks by incorporating child-friendly design elements grounded in actual user demands. Based on the KANO model—an approach used to classify user requirements according to their influence on satisfaction—and Quality Function Deployment (QFD), questionnaire data were collected from 97 children aged 6–12 and 87 parents through field investigations in multiple pocket parks in Nanjing, China. The analysis focused on key dimensions including safety, fun, comfort, and multifunctionality. The results revealed clear differences between children’s and parents’ requirements. Children’s satisfaction is mainly influenced by diverse play spaces and opportunities for interaction with natural elements, while parents place greater emphasis on environmental comfort and facility practicality. Safety was identified as a critical factor for children, whereas social interaction functions were considered relatively less important by both groups. Based on these findings, this study identifies key design priorities for child-friendly pocket parks and provides practical strategies to improve overall park quality and user satisfaction, contributing to healthier and more socially sustainable urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruoyan Wang & Jiajie Cao & Ruiyuan Jiang, 2026. "Analysis of Differences in User Requirements for Child-Friendly Pocket Parks Based on the KANO–QFD Model: A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3392-:d:1910687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3392-:d:1910687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.