IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3337-d1909457.html

Partner Business Model Alignment for Mitigating Operational Conflicts in Exploitation Alliance: Evidence from Chinese Residential Joint Ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Jinxiu Wang

    (School of Management, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China)

  • Li Wang

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

The dynamic process through which latent differences in business models of partners escalate into daily operational conflicts within exploitation alliances remains insufficiently explained. This study examines how alignment in partner business models influences operational conflicts, a key determinant of exploitation alliance sustainability. Questionnaire data from 110 experts in Chinese residential joint ventures (JVs) were used to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings indicate that key resources (KRs) and profit formula (PF) indirectly affect operational conflicts through jointly established core business standards (CBSs). Counterintuitively, these standards significantly increase operational conflict risks (OCRs) when they institutionalize underlying misalignments, thereby acting as a full mediator. The results advance theory by clarifying the micro-process of institutionalized misalignment and refining the Resource-Based View (RBV) in alliance contexts. Practically, the study highlights the importance of conducting thorough ex-ante business model analysis, co-creating operational standards, and undertaking continuous alignment reviews to mitigate conflict and enhance JV viability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinxiu Wang & Li Wang, 2026. "Partner Business Model Alignment for Mitigating Operational Conflicts in Exploitation Alliance: Evidence from Chinese Residential Joint Ventures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3337-:d:1909457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3337-:d:1909457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.