Author
Listed:
- Yan Zhang
(College of Publishing, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Hongliu Zhang
(Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Xiuli Geng
(Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Shanghai 200093, China
School of Intelligent Emergency Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Bingyin Zou
(Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Jungong Road 516, Shanghai 200093, China)
Abstract
To design Product–Service System (PSS) schemes that meet individual customer requirements, the configuration of technology systems is commonly used to select and assemble preferable modules from a predefined product and service library under certain constraints. Service delivery and realization have a significant impact on customer satisfaction in PSSs. However, existing research seldom considers the interactions between PSS configuration and service delivery. This paper focuses on two key stakeholders in PSS configuration: the product manufacturer (PSS provider) and the service providers. A bi-level optimization model based on Stackelberg game theory is proposed to configure the optimal PSS solution. Firstly, the upper-level optimization problem represents the PSS configuration as a leader to maximize customer satisfaction. Secondly, the lower-level optimization problem represents service configuration as a follower to minimize the service supply cost. Thirdly, an improved Dual-Population Co-evolutionary Hybrid Algorithm (DPC-NMHA), combining NSGA-II and MOPSO, is proposed to solve the bi-level optimization model. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are demonstrated through a case study of a refrigerator PSS configuration.
Suggested Citation
Yan Zhang & Hongliu Zhang & Xiuli Geng & Bingyin Zou, 2026.
"Leader–Follower Joint Optimization of Product Configuration and Service Configuration from a Product–Service System Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-30, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3334-:d:1909440
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3334-:d:1909440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.