Author
Listed:
- Muhammet Karaca
(Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Graduate Education, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, 43100 Kütahya, Türkiye)
- Polat Yalınız
(Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, 43100 Kütahya, Türkiye)
Abstract
This study examines accessibility barriers experienced by individuals with disabilities in urban public transportation and analyzes how these barriers influence their travel behavior. Survey data were collected from 450 participants with different disability types in Alanya, Turkey, a tourism-oriented city characterized by pronounced seasonal mobility fluctuations. To ensure internal consistency and analytical robustness, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to prioritize seven accessibility criteria, and the consistency of pairwise comparisons was verified prior to analysis. Based on the AHP-derived weights, a composite accessibility-based Problem Severity Index (PSI) was constructed and integrated into regression models to quantify behavioral effects. The results show that the Problem Severity Index (PSI) is strongly associated with satisfaction (R 2 = 0.895), frequency of public transport use (R 2 = 0.924), and perceived travel difficulty (R 2 = 0.924), reflecting constrained mobility conditions and limited modal alternatives rather than improved service quality. Deficiencies in bus stop design and vehicle accessibility equipment were identified as the most influential barriers affecting public transport experience. Beyond the case study context, the proposed AHP–regression framework provides a structured analytical approach for evaluating accessibility performance and generating empirical evidence to inform inclusive and sustainable urban mobility planning. The findings offer empirical evidence on the relative importance of accessibility barriers and highlight critical infrastructure and service deficiencies. Rather than constituting a decision-support tool themselves, these results provide structured information that, when appropriately contextualized, can inform and guide transport authorities and urban planners in prioritizing accessibility improvements and enhancing inclusive public transport performance over time.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3299-:d:1908488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.