IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3291-d1908144.html

Sustainable AI Integration in Education: Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers’ Continuance Intention to Use Generative AI

Author

Listed:
  • Huazhen Li

    (School of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
    School of Social and Cultural Studies in Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Yadi Xu

    (School of Social and Cultural Studies in Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Cheryl Brown

    (School of Social and Cultural Studies in Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Billy O’Steen

    (School of Leadership and Professional Practice, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand)

  • Zhanni Luo

    (School of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China)

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) changes educational practices, understanding what sustains pre-service teachers’ generative AI use beyond initial adoption becomes important. However, existing research mainly focuses on initial acceptance rather than continuance intention, which is a more realistic indicator for sustainable technology integration. This study drew on an integrated framework including psychological (GAI anxiety, GAI self-efficacy), contextual (facilitating conditions, social influence), and perceptual factors (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness) to examine pre-service teachers’ continuance intention toward GAI in future teaching. Survey data from 549 Chinese pre-service teachers were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Results showed that GAI self-efficacy had the strongest positive associations with both perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. GAI anxiety negatively influenced both perceptions. However, facilitating conditions did not significantly relate to perceived usefulness. The fsQCA identified six configurational pathways clustered into the following three patterns: intrinsic value driven, efficacy capability driven, and external support driven. These findings suggest that teacher education programs should prioritize building GAI self-efficacy and supportive peer environments and not focus solely on infrastructure provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Huazhen Li & Yadi Xu & Cheryl Brown & Billy O’Steen & Zhanni Luo, 2026. "Sustainable AI Integration in Education: Factors Influencing Pre-Service Teachers’ Continuance Intention to Use Generative AI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3291-:d:1908144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3291-:d:1908144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.