IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3282-d1907903.html

Do Green Supply Chain Management Policies Improve Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from China’s Demonstration Program

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wang

    (School of Accounting, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of rising environmental pressure and increasing reliance on supply-chain-based governance, this study examines the environmental impact of China’s Green Supply Chain Management Demonstration Program. Using a panel of Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2024, I exploit the inclusion of firms in the government-designated demonstration list as an exogenous policy shock and estimate its effects within a difference-in-differences framework. The results show that participation in the program significantly improves corporate environmental performance. Treated firms are more likely to adopt environmentally friendly practices, including renewable energy use, circular economy initiatives, and energy-saving technologies, and are more likely to receive environmental awards and other forms of positive environmental recognition. Mechanism analyses suggest that these effects operate through increased green patenting activity and enhanced environmental information disclosure quality. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that the effects are stronger for firms with higher supply chain efficiency, more limited access to external resources, and lower pre-existing green innovation, as well as for state-owned enterprises, firms located in eastern China, and those benefiting from greater government green support. Overall, the findings provide causal evidence that supply-chain-oriented environmental policies can effectively enhance corporate environmental performance in emerging economies

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wang, 2026. "Do Green Supply Chain Management Policies Improve Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from China’s Demonstration Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3282-:d:1907903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3282-:d:1907903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.