IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3273-d1907744.html

Scaffolding for Challenge-Based Learning in Sustainability Education: A Multiple-Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Bart G. Schutte

    (Department of Applied Physics and Science Education, Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Duru Bayram

    (Department of Applied Physics and Science Education, Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Johanna Vennix

    (Department of Applied Physics and Science Education, Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Jan van der Veen

    (Department of Applied Physics and Science Education, Eindhoven School of Education, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Challenge-based learning (CBL) is a student-centered approach engaging learners in complex, open-ended problems. While such openness can foster deeper learning and creativity, it also demands high self-direction. Teachers must therefore provide sufficient scaffolding without undermining CBL’s authenticity. This study examines how secondary education teachers design and enact scaffolding in sustainability-oriented CBL projects, and how students experience this support. A multiple-case study of three projects distinguished soft scaffolding (adaptive, just-in-time support) from hard scaffolding (predefined tools and structures). Data included teacher interviews ( n = 3), student focus groups ( n = 18), and classroom observations. Findings showed the scaffolding type and function depended on project open-endedness, teacher readiness, and alignment with project focus. In the most open-ended project, the teacher mainly used soft scaffolding to guide thinking and decision-making, whereas more structured projects relied on hard scaffolds for procedural support. Students’ experiences varied: some thrived under autonomy, developing ownership and engagement, while others needed more explicit guidance. These results suggest that scaffolds should align with project goals, be explicit in their contribution to progress, match students’ readiness for self-directed learning, be enacted by teachers comfortable in a coaching role, and include affective support to help students manage frustration and uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart G. Schutte & Duru Bayram & Johanna Vennix & Jan van der Veen, 2026. "Scaffolding for Challenge-Based Learning in Sustainability Education: A Multiple-Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-35, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3273-:d:1907744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3273-:d:1907744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.