IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3264-d1907470.html

Safety Risk Prioritization for Sustainable Urban Transport in Underground Metro Stations: An Evidence-Based IVIF FMEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Anıl Özırmak

    (The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, 35390 Izmir, Türkiye)

  • Mete Kun

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University, 35390 Izmir, Türkiye)

Abstract

It is inconceivable that an unsafe mode of transport could be sustainable. Therefore, in this century, where sustainability is at the forefront, occupational health and safety is more important than ever. However, the most used traditional risk analysis methods cannot be applied to every area due to their shortcomings. In this study, a new proposal of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis (IVIF FMEA) within the framework of fuzzy logic overcomes the inadequacies of the traditional method, particularly in uncertainty assessment. In this proposed IVIF FMEA method, the effects of historical incident data are incorporated to improve risk prioritization through static decision-maker weighting and dynamic risk parameter weighting. Then, this novel method is implemented for the operational risks of the underground stations within a metropolitan city in Türkiye. When the proposed method is compared with traditional FMEA and classical IVIF FMEA, failure modes (FMs) related to platform surveillance, working at height, and chemical handling are identified as requiring priority action. To ensure safer and more sustainable transport operations, the prioritization of safety measures is as important as their implementation. The obtained results further offer a transferable and methodologically robust basis for advancing sustainability-oriented safety governance by enabling more evidence-based risk prioritization within urban transportation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Anıl Özırmak & Mete Kun, 2026. "Safety Risk Prioritization for Sustainable Urban Transport in Underground Metro Stations: An Evidence-Based IVIF FMEA Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3264-:d:1907470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3264-:d:1907470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.