IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3254-d1907175.html

Research on the Significance of Criteria Influencing the Deployment of Micromobility Devices in Cities Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Henrikas Sivilevičius

    (Civil Engineering Research Centre, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Sauletekio Av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Vidas Žuraulis

    (Department of Automobile Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Plytines Str. 25, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Edita Juodvalkienė

    (Department of Roads, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Sauletekio Av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Donatas Čygas

    (Department of Roads, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Sauletekio Av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Urban mobility is increasingly affected by air pollution and traffic congestion caused by conventional private vehicles, as well as by insufficient flexibility of public transport. Micromobility devices (MMDs) can mitigate these and other negative impacts on quality of life due to their distinctive characteristics, the significance of which is investigated in this research. To address these challenges facing the modern city, a system of 15 hierarchically unstructured criteria influencing the deployment of MMDs in urban areas was established. The relative weights of these criteria were calculated based on the assessments of 16 experts and the criterion weights were determined using four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: ARTIW-L (Average Rank Transformation into Weight—Linear), ARTIW-N (Average Rank Transformation into Weight—Non-Linear), DPW (Direct Percentage Weight), and AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). The results indicate that the expert judgments are consistent, as Kendall’s coefficient of concordance 0.406 is 3.8 times greater than the minimum value of 0.106 (at a significance level 0.05 and 14 degrees of freedom). In addition, the consistency ratios ( C.R. ) calculated from the AHP pairwise comparison matrices were below 0.1. The demonstrated consistency of the expert judgements and the compatibility of all matrices justify adopting the average of the relative weights obtained using the four MCDM methods as the final solution. According to the experts, the most important criteria for MMD deployment are travel safety (0.1336), travel duration (0.1302), the influence of infrastructure quality on comfort (0.0841), impact on health (0.0805), and the cost of purchasing an MMD (0.0713), while the remaining criteria are of lower significance. Based on the research results it is expected that the identified micromobility implementation measures will be useful for decision-makers and urban development planners.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrikas Sivilevičius & Vidas Žuraulis & Edita Juodvalkienė & Donatas Čygas, 2026. "Research on the Significance of Criteria Influencing the Deployment of Micromobility Devices in Cities Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3254-:d:1907175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3254-:d:1907175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.