SIRAF: From Sustainability Assessment Tools to Reflective Sustainability Implementation in Higher Education

The integration of sustainability in higher education institutions (HEIs) is critical but often hindered by the limitations of existing sustainability assessment tools (SATs), which are complex, rigid, and not sufficiently adaptable to specific organizational and socio-economic or local contexts. This study presents the Sustainability Implementation Reflective Assessment Framework (SIRAF), a meta-framework designed to assist HEIs in developing their own reflective, flexible, and user-friendly tools. The SIRAF taxonomy was developed through the findings of: a. a systematic literature review retrieved in authors’ previous research, b. a comparative analysis and synthesis of 12 SATs, as well as c. a theory-building process. It features a taxonomy of six core indicators with multiple sub-indicators. Its “pick-and-mix” approach enables institutions to customize assessments to align with their distinct needs, objectives, and resources. The SIRAF model was assessed in eight Greek universities offering tourism studies programs. The assessment incorporated data from institutional websites and a qualitative analysis. An evaluation of three fundamental indicators—curriculum, research, and institutional identity—disclosed a paucity of sustainability integration in curricula and governance, notwithstanding the augmentation of sustainability-related research activity. The findings underscore the significance of meticulously designed yet user-centred tools that facilitate evaluation, organizational learning, and strategic planning. As SIRAF shifts its paradigm of sustainability reporting from external compliance to internal improvement, it concomitantly reduces technical barriers and fosters institutional change. Though initially implemented in tourism and higher education, its inherent flexibility suggests the potential for broader applications, while future enhancements could include weighted scoring and wider empirical validation.