IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3200-d1902635.html

Cultural Visual Symbols in Intangible Cultural Heritage Branding and Their Effects on Cultural Identity and Brand Preference: Implications for Cultural Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Jiajia Zhao

    (Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Lixian Xie

    (Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

  • Ziyang Huang

    (Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

With the increasing importance of cultural consumption and the sustainable revitalization of intangible cultural heritage (ICH), visual communication has become a key mechanism for translating cultural meanings into contemporary branding contexts. This study develops a semiotics-informed structural model that integrates semiotic theory with consumer behavior frameworks to explain how cultural visual symbols influence brand preference through cultural cognition and cultural identity. Using Wufangzhai as an empirical case, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) is applied to survey data from 274 consumers. The results indicate that different visual elements exert differentiated effects on cultural cognition, with color and packaging showing stronger influences, while typography plays a more significant role in shaping cultural identity. Cultural identity is also found to mediate the relationship between cultural cognition and brand preference. These findings contribute to cultural branding research and provide practical insights for the design of ICH visual communication systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiajia Zhao & Lixian Xie & Ziyang Huang, 2026. "Cultural Visual Symbols in Intangible Cultural Heritage Branding and Their Effects on Cultural Identity and Brand Preference: Implications for Cultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3200-:d:1902635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3200/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3200/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3200-:d:1902635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.