Author
Listed:
- Jingyao Wu
(Shaanxi Provincial Ecological Geological Survey Center, Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey, Xi’an 710004, China)
- Xiyou Hu
(Shaanxi Provincial Ecological Geological Survey Center, Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey, Xi’an 710004, China)
- Zhang Yuan
(Shaanxi Provincial Ecological Geological Survey Center, Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey, Xi’an 710004, China)
- Qiao Liu
(School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)
- Chenxi Li
(School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)
Abstract
Improving the living environment in rural areas is an important task and a key breakthrough point in implementing the rural revitalization strategy. It not only directly affects the vital interests and health protection of farmers, but is also an important measure to promote ecological civilization construction and achieve the development goal of a beautiful China. Taking environmental demonstration villages in Shaanxi Province as the research object, questionnaire data were obtained through field research and face-to-face interviews. This study constructs an evaluation index system covering five dimensions: village appearance, domestic sewage treatment, rural toilet renovation, domestic waste treatment, and construction and management mechanism. The entropy method is used to determine indicator weights, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is applied to measure the implementation effect. The research results indicate that the overall effect is between “average” and “good” (score 3.924), with domestic sewage treatment scoring highest and construction and management mechanism lowest. The study identifies key problems such as low farmer participation, insufficient funding sources, inadequate infrastructure maintenance, and weak environmental awareness. Based on these findings, countermeasures are proposed: enhancing farmers’ environmental awareness and participation; diversifying capital investment; improving infrastructure and establishing long-term management mechanisms; cultivating social capital; and strengthening the leading role of the government. This study provides empirical evidence and policy recommendations for improving rural environmental governance.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3135-:d:1901275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.