IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p3117-d1900794.html

Comparative Modeling of Greening Design Scenarios for Sustainable and Climate-Responsive Urban Regeneration: Microclimate and Thermal Comfort Effects in an Italian Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zixin Zhao

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 48, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alberto Barbaresi

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 48, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Laura Caggiu

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 48, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Patrizia Tassinari

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 48, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Daniele Torreggiani

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Giuseppe Fanin, 48, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Urban overheating poses major challenges in Mediterranean cities, affecting public health and well-being. This study comparatively evaluates how alternative greening configurations influence urban microclimate and outdoor thermal comfort in a brownfield regeneration site in Imola, Italy, using ENVI-met simulations under a representative extreme summer condition. Eight scenarios with varying vegetation density, structure, and spatial arrangement were modelled on the hottest day of the year, and the Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) was evaluated at representative times. Results show that greening reduces heat stress, though its effectiveness varies over time and across configurations. No meaningful cooling occurred at 5:00 a.m., confirming that vegetation has a limited impact during nocturnal radiative processes. At 9:00 a.m., the medium-density scenario (S2b) achieved the greatest PET reduction (~2 °C), suggesting favorable evapotranspiration conditions under moderate radiation. At 4:00 p.m., the distributed high-density scenario (S3.2b) provided the strongest mitigation (~1.8–2 °C). Distributed layouts outperformed clustered ones, highlighting the non-linear nature of vegetation cooling. Zonal analysis showed the largest cooling in public green areas, followed by parking, building, and path zones, demonstrating the influence of surface type and shading geometry. Greening also produced modest improvements in surrounding neighborhoods (up to 0.8 °C in the morning), although impacts remained localized. Overall, results highlight how vegetation quantity, structure, and spatial distribution influence cooling performance under critical summer conditions, supporting climate-responsive urban regeneration design. These findings contribute to sustainable urban planning by supporting nature-based strategies for climate adaptation and improved environmental quality in regenerating urban districts. Future work should consider seasonal vegetation dynamics and multi-objective design optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Zixin Zhao & Alberto Barbaresi & Laura Caggiu & Patrizia Tassinari & Daniele Torreggiani, 2026. "Comparative Modeling of Greening Design Scenarios for Sustainable and Climate-Responsive Urban Regeneration: Microclimate and Thermal Comfort Effects in an Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-27, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3117-:d:1900794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3117-:d:1900794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.