IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p3087-d1900317.html

A Study on Safety Risk Identification and Governance in Universities Based on the 2-4-4R Model

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Qi

    (School of Law and Humanity, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yan Cheng

    (School of Law and Humanity, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The sustainable development of university safety governance is an important component of the national security management system and also serves as a fundamental safeguard for protecting the life and health of students and staff on campus. The improvement of university safety risk governance relies on analyzing the identification of various safety risks and maintaining an effective crisis management process for potential sudden safety risks. The 24Model and the 4R model have respectively demonstrated strong analytical advantages in the fields of accident causation analysis and emergency crisis management; however, few studies have examined the internal relationship between them. This study attempts to integrate the 24Model and the 4R crisis management framework to propose and analyze a 2-4-4R model for university safety risk management. Through a case study, the model is applied to analyze a laboratory explosion accident at a university. The results show that the risk factors leading to campus safety accidents can be analyzed from four aspects: safety culture, safety management system, individual factors, and unsafe acts and physical conditions. University safety management should comprehensively identify these four types of factors and propose governance measures sequentially from the four stages of reduction, readiness, response, and recovery in order to improve safety management capacity. The case analysis confirms that the 2-4-4R model has applicability and practical value in the identification and governance analysis of university safety risks. It provides a systematic research perspective for the identification and management of safety risks in universities, and is of great significance for promoting the sustainable development of universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Qi & Yan Cheng, 2026. "A Study on Safety Risk Identification and Governance in Universities Based on the 2-4-4R Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3087-:d:1900317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3087/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3087/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3087-:d:1900317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.