IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p3070-d1899946.html

Evaluating the Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Alternative for Architectural Heritage Through the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Method—A Study of a National Monument of Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Obafemi A. P. Olukoya

    (Department of Environmental Planning, Brandenburg Technical University, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
    Department of Research and Development, Vernacular Heritage Initiative, Edmund Medani Crescent, Mabushi, Abuja 900108, Nigeria)

Abstract

Adaptive reuse has emerged to become a tool for implementing the understanding of sustainability in the domain of architectural conservation, as it encourages the continued usage of old buildings as means of reducing environmental impact, as well as preserving socio-cultural capital while generating economic income. However, in its practice, the decisions regarding granting meanings, interpretation, and preserving memories within adaptation processes are dominated by expert-driven approaches that inadequately incorporate stakeholder values or intangible heritage dimensions. To this end, this study aims to contribute to the current debate by adopting a participatory co-evaluation framework that integrates both authenticity perspectives and sustainability dimensions using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating adaptive reuse alternatives for an abandoned prefabricated wooden heritage building. Stakeholder priorities were drawn through a workshop and transformed into normalized weights using the Simos technique. Four design alternative typologies—namely, Continuity, Cultivation, Differential, and Optimization—were assessed and compared against 20 performance indicators across heritage, social, ecological, and economic criteria using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Indicator-level analyses and sensitivity tests (±10% and ±20% weight variations) were applied to confirm the robustness of rankings. The results from the best-performing alternative demonstrated the trade-offs between heritage authenticity and sustainability objectives, as well as demonstrating how combining participatory methods with quantitative evaluation can support evidence-based decision-making for adaptive reuse. The applied integrated framework helps bridge the gap between heritage theory and practice by combining authenticity, participation, and sustainability in one analytical approach, supporting evidence-based decisions for adaptive reuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Obafemi A. P. Olukoya, 2026. "Evaluating the Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Alternative for Architectural Heritage Through the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Method—A Study of a National Monument of Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-37, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3070-:d:1899946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3070/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/3070/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3070-:d:1899946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.