Author
Listed:
- Fan Xu
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China)
- Yuan Wang
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China)
- Haitao Xiang
(State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 211135, China)
Abstract
Optimizing planting density is a critical, cost-effective strategy for sustainable agricultural intensification, yet moving beyond static recommendations to environment-specific precision management remains a key challenge. This study establishes a three-step framework (comprising zoning, response extraction, and machine learning modeling) to determine optimum planting density (OPD) for rice ( Oryza sativa L.). Utilizing a data-driven synthesis of 960 field observations from the Northeast Black Soil Region (NBSR) of China, we identified distinct spatial variability in OPD (16.6 to 37.4 × 10 4 hills ha −1 ). Northern regions computationally prioritized higher densities, aligning with agronomic strategies to offset thermal constraints, while southern regions favored lower densities to reduce canopy competition. Soil properties, particularly Soil Organic Carbon (SOC), pH, Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), and Total Nitrogen (TN), were identified as the dominant predictive indicators, collectively surpassing climatic factors in their predictive importance. This highlights the foundational role of soil buffering capacity in estimating crop tolerance to density management. Based on model-derived estimates, optimized density management indicated potential yield improvements of 3.8% to 9.7% (up to 872.32 kg ha −1 ) compared to conventional practices. By replacing uniform practices with dynamic, environment-driven strategies, this work contributes to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2 (Zero Hunger), 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and 13 (Climate Action), offering a scalable solution for diverse rice production systems under climate change.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3025-:d:1899035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.