Author
Listed:
- Maria Paz Sáez-Pérez
(Building Constructions Department, Advanced Technical School for Building Engineering, Campus Fuentenueva, Universidad de Granada, Calle Severo Ochoa, s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain)
- Alejandro Cabeza-Prieto
(E.T.S. de Arquitectura, Universidad de Valladolid, Avda Salamanca, 18, 47014 Valladolid, Spain)
Abstract
Covered courtyards are increasingly being adopted as a passive strategy for the climatic rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings. However, their thermal behaviour is strongly conditioned by roof geometry, local climate conditions, and future climate warming, aspects that have not yet been comparatively addressed within a climate resilience framework. This study evaluates the energy and thermal performance of three representative roof typologies for covered historic courtyards—glazed dome, glazed flat roof, and south-facing sawtooth roof—across two Mediterranean climates of contrasting severity (cold continental and warm–dry), considering both current and future climatic conditions (2050–2080). Additionally, two design approaches are compared: a baseline design (BD), based exclusively on geometric configuration and standard glazing, and an enhanced passive design (EPD), which incorporates improved glazing, controlled natural ventilation, and seasonal solar control. Dynamic simulations using EnergyPlus/DesignBuilder are employed to analyse heating and cooling demands, free-running thermal behaviour, overheating risk, and the climatic robustness of each solution. The results show that roof geometry constitutes the dominant factor governing the long-term thermal resilience of covered courtyards, particularly under future climate warming scenarios, while enhanced passive strategies significantly mitigate cooling demand and overheating in the most penalised typologies. The south-facing sawtooth roof consistently exhibits the highest climatic robustness under free-running conditions across the analysed scenarios, whereas the glazed dome and flat roof solutions display greater climatic sensitivity and benefit more substantially from the application of enhanced passive design strategies. Overall, the results provide quantitative design criteria to support resilient interventions in historic covered courtyards in Mediterranean climates under climate change.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:3020-:d:1898946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.