IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2945-d1896554.html

A Systematic Review of the Trajectory of Urban Resilience Research: A Bibliometric Perspective on Global Trends and China’s Pathway

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Han

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Gui Fu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhirong Wu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuxuan Lu

    (School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xuecai Xie

    (College of Engineering Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Surui Xu

    (School of Safety Engineering, China University of Labor Relations, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

This study employs bibliometric analysis, utilizing the visualization tools CiteSpace 6.3.R1 and VOSviewer 1.6.18, to systematically examine 8727 documents from the Web of Science Core Collection (2000–2024) related to “resilient cities” and “urban resilience.” It explores the evolution of resilient city research, current international trends, practical developments in China, and future directions. The study addresses key questions concerning the theoretical foundations of resilient cities, research advances in the security field, China’s implementation pathways, and emerging trends. Findings indicate that resilient city discourse has evolved from a narrow focus on engineering-based disaster prevention toward a multidimensional, socio-ecological–economic adaptive system. This progression can be divided into three phases: the theoretical foundation period (2000–2008), the technological integration period (2009–2018), and the complex crisis response period (2019–present). Internationally, practices are increasingly centered on climate change adaptation, supported by multi-level governance frameworks such as the MCR2030 initiative. China demonstrates a “dual-track” approach that combines policy-driven initiatives with localized innovations, advancing through international pilot projects, domestic policy experimentation, and grassroots exploration. The study also highlights differences between Chinese and Western research in perspectives, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks. Future resilient city development is expected to emphasize systematization, digitalization, and equity, leveraging technologies such as digital twins and artificial intelligence while fostering community participation and multi-scale collaborative governance. By systematically outlining the theoretical evolution and practical logic of resilient cities, this study offers insights for urban resilience building in developing countries and provides a methodological reference for enhancing resilience capabilities across different administrative levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Han & Gui Fu & Zhirong Wu & Yuxuan Lu & Xuecai Xie & Surui Xu, 2026. "A Systematic Review of the Trajectory of Urban Resilience Research: A Bibliometric Perspective on Global Trends and China’s Pathway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2945-:d:1896554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2945-:d:1896554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.