IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2940-d1896439.html

Impacts of Wetland Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon and Carbon Sequestration Function: A Case Study of the Huixian Wetland in the Li River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Yongkang Wang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Minghao Tian

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Junfeng Dai

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Zupeng Wan

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control Theory and Technology, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Baoli Xu

    (University Engineering Research Center of Watershed Protection and Green Development, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

Abstract

Wetlands play a vital role in the global carbon cycle and serve as critical carbon sink systems. However, increasing human disturbances and land-use changes have led to widespread wetland degradation, severely weakening their carbon sequestration capacity. This study investigated the Huixian Wetland in the Li River Basin of Southwest China to examine the impacts of wetland degradation on soil physicochemical properties, organic carbon fractions, and carbon fluxes. Based on vegetation and environmental conditions, the wetland was classified into four degradation gradients: non-degraded (ND), slightly degraded (SD), moderately degraded (MD), and heavily degraded (HD), and their spatial differences were systematically analyzed. The results showed that with increasing degradation, soil moisture, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus significantly decreased, whereas soil bulk density and electrical conductivity exhibited an increasing trend. Total organic carbon and active organic carbon fractions, including readily oxidizable organic carbon, light fraction organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and dissolved organic carbon, exhibited a pronounced decreasing trend along the degradation gradient, with the decline being most evident in the HD area. Among the labile carbon fractions, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and light fraction organic carbon (LFOC) exhibited the most drastic declines in heavily degraded areas, indicating their high sensitivity as early warning indicators of wetland degradation. Observations of CO 2 fluxes revealed that from April to September, the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was negative across all areas, indicating that the wetland functioned as a carbon sink overall. However, NEE values increased with higher degradation levels, suggesting a progressive decline in the carbon sequestration capacity of the wetland; ecosystem respiration (ER) peaked in July and increased with the degree of degradation. The findings indicate that wetland degradation leads to soil environment deterioration, reduction in organic carbon storage, and enhanced CO 2 emissions, ultimately weakening its carbon sink function. To enhance carbon sequestration capacity and maintain ecological functions, sustainable management strategies such as hydrological restoration and vegetation reconstruction are recommended. This study provides a scientific basis for wetland ecological conservation and carbon management in the context of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongkang Wang & Minghao Tian & Junfeng Dai & Zupeng Wan & Baoli Xu, 2026. "Impacts of Wetland Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon and Carbon Sequestration Function: A Case Study of the Huixian Wetland in the Li River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2940-:d:1896439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2940-:d:1896439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.