IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2907-d1895784.html

From Land Use to Urban Expansion: A Comparative Study of Quanzhou and Xi’an in the East and West of China

Author

Listed:
  • Kexin Sun

    (College of Geography and Tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China)

  • Bin Quan

    (College of Geography and Tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China
    Hengyang Base of International Centre on Space Technologies for Natural and Cultural Heritage Under the Auspices of UNESCO, Hengyang 421002, China)

  • Kui Liu

    (College of Geography and Tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China)

Abstract

Regional differences in land use transitions and urban expansion patterns have become increasingly pronounced under rapid urbanization. However, conventional land use and land cover change (LUCC) analyses often rely on independent graphical presentations, limiting systematic cross-regional comparison and the identification of spatial heterogeneity. To address this limitation, this study constructs a comparative land use transition analytical framework integrating LUCC contrastive transition patterns, the landscape expansion index (LEI), and the PLUS model. The framework enables structured identification of transition directions, intensity differentials, and stage-specific characteristics, thereby enhancing the reproducibility and comparability of cross-regional land use analysis. Using Xi’an (inland) and Quanzhou (coastal) as representative cases, this study analyzed their land use changes from 1990 to 2020 based on Intensity Analysis and LUCC contrastive transition patterns and quantified the differences in urban expansion using the urban expansion intensity index and expansion pattern metrics. The results show that the urban expansion of Xi’an and Quanzhou was active during 1990–2020, with crops as the main stable source of urban expansion. This urban expansion mainly took the form of edge-expansion and infilling, with urban development transitioning from disorderly expansion to intensive utilization. Notable regional disparities were observed: Forest conversion to urban land was substantially higher in Quanzhou, reflecting stronger ecological land pressure in coastal areas, whereas grass conversion to crops was more prominent in Xi’an, suggesting agricultural spatial adjustment under food security constraints in inland regions. The PLUS model further demonstrates that urban expansion is jointly influenced by topographic conditions (DEM) and economic growth (GDP), highlighting the coupled effects of natural constraints and development dynamics. This study clarifies the differentiation characteristics and driving forces of coastal and inland urban expansion, providing a scientific basis for differentiated territorial spatial planning, ecological protection, and farmland management in eastern and western regions. It also helps formulate more targeted urban development policies based on regional resource endowments, promoting regional coordination and sustainable urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Kexin Sun & Bin Quan & Kui Liu, 2026. "From Land Use to Urban Expansion: A Comparative Study of Quanzhou and Xi’an in the East and West of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2907-:d:1895784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2907-:d:1895784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.