IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2892-d1895400.html

Spatiotemporal Use Patterns and Perceived Health-Related Benefits of Pocket Parks: Evidence from Three Parks in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Qinyi Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yuxuan Liang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xinyue Xu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jingying Wu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xinqi Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Hui Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Sijie Zhu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Rapid urban densification has intensified the scarcity of urban green space and challenged residents’ health and well-being. Pocket parks, as micro-scale infill green spaces embedded in the urban fabric, are increasingly adopted to expand everyday access to nature. Using three representative pocket parks in Nanjing, China, this study draws on self-reported data from questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews to characterize spatiotemporal use patterns and examine their links to perceived psychological, physiological, and social benefits through quantitative statistical analysis and modeling. Results show that pocket park use is highly routinized. Temporal patterns were evident, with weekend and autumn visits associated with improvements in emotional well-being, pain relief, and parent–child interaction. Perceived benefits were generally positive across psychological, physiological, and social domains, with psychological benefits—especially emotional relief and reduced loneliness—reported most strongly. Benefit levels varied across parks and user groups. Mechanism analysis reveals that the park supply factor, reflecting accessibility and basic facility provision, showed the most consistent direct paths to perceived benefits, whereas facility use and length of stay had no significant direct effects. These findings suggest that pocket park planning should prioritize accessibility and adequate basic provision, while strengthening activity support in ways that align with local use rhythms to enhance health-oriented performance in high-density cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinyi Wang & Yuxuan Liang & Xinyue Xu & Jingying Wu & Xinqi Zhang & Hui Wang & Sijie Zhu, 2026. "Spatiotemporal Use Patterns and Perceived Health-Related Benefits of Pocket Parks: Evidence from Three Parks in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2892-:d:1895400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2892-:d:1895400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.