Author
Listed:
- Caiyun Ni
(Jiangxi Key Laboratory of River Headwater Water Ecology Protection, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying & Mapping Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
- Tong Li
(Jiangxi Key Laboratory of River Headwater Water Ecology Protection, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying & Mapping Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)
Abstract
Understanding how Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) interact—through synergies or trade-offs—is critical for coordinating economic growth, social equity, and environmental protection at the regional scale. However, empirical evidence on the structure, directionality, and spatial heterogeneity of SDG interactions remains limited, particularly in policy-supported regions undergoing development transitions. This study addresses this gap by examining SDG interactions in the former Central Soviet Area of Jiangxi Province, China. Using panel data from eight prefecture-level cities spanning 2001–2022, we construct a multi-dimensional SDG evaluation framework encompassing economic development, social equity and livelihood security, resource utilization and environmental protection, and sustainable cities and communities. A two-stage analytical approach is employed: Spearman’s rank correlation analysis is used to identify synergistic and trade-off relationships among SDGs, and a Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression (GTWR) model is applied to estimate directional influences and their spatiotemporal heterogeneity among development dimensions. The results indicate that synergistic relationships dominate the regional SDG interaction network, while trade-offs are comparatively limited and selectively concentrated in specific goal pairings. Marked spatial heterogeneity is observed, with stronger synergies in the east than in the west. Functional-zone analysis reveals that ecological and cultural conservation zones exhibit the strongest synergies, whereas industrial transformation zones face pronounced trade-offs, particularly between food security (SDG2) and income inequality (SDG10). GTWR results further demonstrate directional asymmetry among development dimensions, with social equity exerting a stronger influence on economic development than the reverse, and relatively weaker feedback from economic growth to resource and environmental outcomes. Overall, this study provides a systematic, spatiotemporally explicit assessment of SDG interactions in a policy-supported regional context. By integrating interaction analysis with spatiotemporal modeling, it offers a robust empirical basis for understanding where, how, and in which direction SDGs interact, thereby contributing to more context-sensitive approaches to regional sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2890-:d:1895315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.