IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2888-d1895260.html

Campus Blue-Green-Grey Spaces and College Students’ Health: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Danqiuzi Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Zilin Zhou

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Shumeng Ren

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

  • Yuyin Su

    (Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture (ESALA), The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK)

  • Jing Zhao

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Fangrong Yang

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)

Abstract

University students often face various stressors that impact their physical, mental, and social well-being, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability of student health in higher education settings. Growing evidence suggests that exposure to campus green and blue spaces has significant health benefits. However, empirical studies evaluating the health effects of campus outdoor grey spaces (playgrounds, roads, squares) remain limited. Grey spaces are identified as grey in a material sense (urban, concrete, artificial, constructed). This systematic review synthesizes empirical research on the associations between outdoor campus spaces and student health, with implications for sustainable campus planning. Following the PRISMA protocol, 60 studies were identified and included from four databases (Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed). The results were as follows: (1) Research in this field has increased over the past five years, with Asia (particularly China) contributing the largest share of studies; (2) The research topics were diverse, covering five major themes of campus outdoor spaces and 28 student health indicators; (3) The measurement of environmental and physical–mental health combined subjective assessments with objective data, whereas social health primarily relied on self-reported subjective perceptions; (4) Campus outdoor spaces affected university students’ health by promoting physical activity, modulating physiological responses, alleviating stress and cognition, and providing opportunities for social interaction and solitude. Campus outdoor spaces contribute to students’ sustainable well-being in various ways. Green and blue spaces provide significant psychological restorative benefits, while grey spaces play a crucial role in promoting physical activities and social interactions, thus warranting greater attention in campus planning. These findings highlight the importance of designing equitable, multifunctional blue-green-grey spaces to support healthier and more sustainable university campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Danqiuzi Li & Zilin Zhou & Shumeng Ren & Yuyin Su & Jing Zhao & Fangrong Yang, 2026. "Campus Blue-Green-Grey Spaces and College Students’ Health: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-32, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2888-:d:1895260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2888/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2888/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2888-:d:1895260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.