IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2887-d1895164.html

Geopolitical Risk and National Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from G20 Member Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Yining Kang

    (School of International Education, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qiuyu Zhang

    (School of International Education, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jinpeng Wen

    (School of Journalism and Communication, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xiaoying Bi

    (School of International Education, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

  • Ge Li

    (School of International Education, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun 130117, China)

Abstract

This study investigates how geopolitical risk shaped the green economic efficiency (GEE) of 19 countries in the G20 group from 2000 to 2022. Using the Super-SBM model, we construct a cross-country measure of GEE and empirically examine both its determinants and underlying mechanisms. The results show that rising geopolitical risk significantly undermines GEE, indicating that external uncertainty disrupts countries’ ability to balance economic growth with environmental performance. Mechanism analysis reveals that geopolitical tensions heighten energy security concerns, leading to increased fossil fuel consumption, and trigger exchange rate depreciation to decrease green economic efficiency. Moreover, foreign direct investment mitigates the adverse effects of geopolitical risk by facilitating technology spillovers and capital inflows. Moreover, geopolitical risks have different impacts on the efficiency of a country’s green economy, varying across levels such as the country’s economic development level, resource endowment, and trade openness. The findings highlight geopolitical risk as a constraint on global green transition. Policymakers should strengthen energy source diversity, stabilize exchange rate environments, and promote FDI to enhance national resilience. Building institutional capacity is essential in sustaining green economic efficiency under rising geopolitical uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Yining Kang & Qiuyu Zhang & Jinpeng Wen & Xiaoying Bi & Ge Li, 2026. "Geopolitical Risk and National Green Economic Efficiency: Evidence from G20 Member Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2887-:d:1895164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2887/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2887/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2887-:d:1895164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.