IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2885-d1895205.html

Analysis of Key Factors for Natural Regeneration of Cypress Forests in the Karst Area of the Lijiang River

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Gan

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Karst Geology, Guilin 541004, China
    School of Finance and Insurance, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Dingyuan Liu

    (Shandong Lan’an Landscape Engineering Co., Ltd., Jinan 250013, China)

  • Ying Huang

    (Department of Tourism and Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Haitao Yu

    (Department of Tourism and Landscape Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China)

  • Weiqun Luo

    (Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Karst Geology, Guilin 541004, China)

Abstract

The natural regeneration of planted forests in karst landscapes is severely constrained by extreme substrate heterogeneity and fragile edaphic conditions. However, the relative importance and interaction pathways of environmental versus stand structural drivers remain poorly quantified. In this study, 54 plots (10 m × 10 m) were surveyed across Cupressus funebris plantations in the karst landscape of the Lijiang River Basin, southern China. To identify the key factors and causal pathways governing regeneration, redundancy analysis (RDA), variation partitioning, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), and threshold analyses were applied. Regeneration exhibited pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with 42.6% of plots showing complete recruitment failure and a characteristic inverted J-shaped size class distribution. The analysis identified soil rock fragment content (as a negative constraint) and canopy gap area (as a positive driver) as the two dominant predictors. PLS-SEM revealed that environmental factors influence regeneration primarily through an indirect pathway mediated by stand structure ( R 2 = 0.683 ) rather than through direct effects. Threshold analyses identified quantitative benchmarks for key drivers, including a gap area breakpoint of approximately 10 m 2 and a presence–absence effect of soil rock fragments. These findings contribute to a more sophisticated mechanistic understanding of forest regeneration in karst ecosystems and provide an empirical foundation for silvicultural management that aims to encourage natural regeneration and ecological restoration of degraded karst plantations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Gan & Dingyuan Liu & Ying Huang & Haitao Yu & Weiqun Luo, 2026. "Analysis of Key Factors for Natural Regeneration of Cypress Forests in the Karst Area of the Lijiang River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2885-:d:1895205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2885-:d:1895205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.