IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2873-d1893343.html

A Comparative Study on the Sustainable Remediation of Arsenic Pollution in Water and Soil Using Iron-Modified and Cerium-Modified Biochar

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Wang

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Xiaoxian Yuan

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Shifeng Li

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Shiji Bie

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Yang Zhou

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Shuzheng Guo

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Zhipu Wang

    (College of Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

Abstract

Arsenic (As) pollution has become a global concern, and the search for effective and sustainable As remediation methods has attracted much attention. Sustainable and cost-effective technologies for As remediation are essential to protect public health. This study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), by transforming agricultural waste into value-added biochar for environmental remediation. Currently, studies on the remediation of As pollution using iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) and cerium-modified biochar (Ce-BC) have demonstrated promising application potential. Although there is an established research foundation regarding their remediation performance and mechanisms, comparative studies evaluating their performance and mechanisms under unified experimental conditions remain limited. As in this study, Fe-BC and Ce-BC were prepared and systematically investigated. The As remediation performance and mechanisms of the two biochars were compared and analyzed through material characterization, aqueous adsorption experiments, and soil remediation assessments. The results showed that the specific surface areas of Fe-BC and Ce-BC were 94.380 m 2 ·g −1 and 36.388 m 2 ·g −1 , respectively, both higher than that of the original biochar (BC). The Langmuir and Freundlich models adequately fitted the As adsorption processes of all three materials. Fe-BC and Ce-BC exhibited a tendency toward monolayer adsorption for As(III). The Freundlich distribution coefficient K F of Fe-BC was 0.1604, which was higher than that of BC and Ce-BC, indicating superior adsorption performance for As(III). In the pot experiment, when Fe-BC and Ce-BC were applied at 5%, the As content in ryegrass decreased by 78.38% and 77.15%, respectively. Fe-BC reduced the available As content in soil by 63.1% and decreased As accumulation in ryegrass by 78.38%. The reduction in available As content achieved by Fe-BC was greater than that achieved by Ce-BC. Fe(III) oxides supported on Fe-BC immobilized As through complexation and precipitation mechanisms. Fe 0 and Fe 3 O 4 in the materials altered the redox potential of the local microenvironment, affecting the transformation and stabilization of As species. Ce-BC primarily oxidized As(III) to As(V), and Ce 4+ facilitated the formation of CeAsO 4 precipitates due to its high redox potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Wang & Xiaoxian Yuan & Shifeng Li & Shiji Bie & Yang Zhou & Shuzheng Guo & Zhipu Wang, 2026. "A Comparative Study on the Sustainable Remediation of Arsenic Pollution in Water and Soil Using Iron-Modified and Cerium-Modified Biochar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2873-:d:1893343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2873-:d:1893343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.