IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2867-d1893216.html

Environmental Benchmarking for Sustainable Clinker Production: A Harmonized Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment Using Real Industrial Data

Author

Listed:
  • Bilguun Mend

    (Climate and Energy R&D Group, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52581, Republic of Korea)

  • Youngjun Lee

    (Climate and Energy R&D Group, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52581, Republic of Korea)

  • Jeong-Hwan Bang

    (Climate and Energy R&D Group, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52581, Republic of Korea)

  • Yong-Sik Chu

    (Climate and Energy R&D Group, Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju 52581, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Clinker production is the main contributor to the environmental footprint of cement manufacturing and represents a key target for improving the sustainability of the cement industry. This study presents a harmonized cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of clinker production based on real industrial plant-level data and establishes environmental benchmarks for inter-plant comparison. The framework enables consistent evaluation of environmental performance while minimizing methodological inconsistencies that often limit the comparability of LCA studies. Using a plant-level industrial inventory dataset, key energy and emission indicators were assessed and compared with a literature-based benchmark under harmonized methodological conditions. The case-study plant exhibited a thermal energy intensity of 3162 MJ/t clinker and electricity consumption of 52.23 kWh/t clinker, representing improvements of approximately 6% and 29%, respectively, relative to the benchmark system. However, total direct CO 2 emissions remained comparable at 1010 kg CO 2 /t clinker, indicating that improvements in operational energy efficiency do not necessarily result in proportional reductions in overall greenhouse gas emissions. Process-related emissions from limestone calcination accounted for approximately 73% of total emissions, limiting the mitigation potential achievable through energy efficiency alone. These findings highlight the importance of integrated benchmarking approaches that simultaneously consider energy intensity, emission structure, and climate impact when evaluating clinker production systems and developing decarbonization strategies for the cement industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilguun Mend & Youngjun Lee & Jeong-Hwan Bang & Yong-Sik Chu, 2026. "Environmental Benchmarking for Sustainable Clinker Production: A Harmonized Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment Using Real Industrial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2867-:d:1893216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2867-:d:1893216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.