Author
Listed:
- Shuting Chen
(School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
- Jin Wang
(China Biotech Fermentation Industry Association, Beijing 100005, China)
- Ayueerguli Abuduniyazi
(School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
- Mingjun Gao
(School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
- Liming Dong
(School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
- Guannan Liu
(MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China)
- Suping Yu
(School of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light Industry, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
Abstract
Citric acid (CA) necessitates the investigation of the environmental footprint from its production. This study compared three recovery technologies at different readiness levels, industrial calcium hydrogen salt precipitation–ion exchange (CHP-IE), pilot-scale solvent extraction (SE), and laboratory-scale bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED), to evaluate the life cycle environmental impacts of CA production when employing each recovery technology. SE and BMED were selected as emerging alternatives, as both are potential candidates to offer environmental or economic advantages over CHP-IE. By modeling the continuous improvement in the key production parameters as cumulative production experience increases, technological learning curves capture the efficiency gains that occur as technologies mature. This study pioneers an integrated ex-ante LCA framework that couples technological learning curves with energy transition scenarios to prospectively compare emerging CA recovery technologies against an industrialized process. Currently, CHP-IE shows the highest profit of 1078 CNY/t CA and the lowest global warming potential (GWP) of 1.79 t CO 2 eq/t CA, with the latter advantage projected to persist until 2030. By 2050, under deep decarbonization, BMED becomes the lowest-carbon option with 0.78 t CO 2 eq/t CA. Furthermore, with maize as the primary raw material, improved cultivation models in Northeast China reduce the environmental impacts of CA production by approximately 3% in acidification potential (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP), while diversified cropping systems in North China yield reductions of over 50% in these two categories. This paper provides an approach of comprehensive evaluation, supporting technology selection and green supply chain development in the CA industry.
Suggested Citation
Shuting Chen & Jin Wang & Ayueerguli Abuduniyazi & Mingjun Gao & Liming Dong & Guannan Liu & Suping Yu, 2026.
"Prospective Environmental Assessment of Citric Acid Production: An Integrated Framework of Ex-Ante LCA and Technological Learning,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-28, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2848-:d:1892926
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2848-:d:1892926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.