Author
Listed:
- Walter Shiba
(Economic Analysis Unit, Agricultural Research Council, 1134 Park Street, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)
- Mankaba Whitney Matli
(Economic Analysis Unit, Agricultural Research Council, 1134 Park Street, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)
- Ntanda Gqutyana
(Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)
- Portia Mdwebi
(Economic Analysis Unit, Agricultural Research Council, 1134 Park Street, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)
- Nomfundo Magagula
(Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa)
- Siphe Zantsi
(Economic Analysis Unit, Agricultural Research Council, 1134 Park Street, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, 28 Pioneer Ave., Florida Park, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa
Department of Agricultural Science, Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha 6031, South Africa)
- Michael Bairu
(Agricultural Research Council, Vegetable, Industrial and Medicinal Plants (VIMP), Pretoria 0002, South Africa)
Abstract
Access to quality seed is a critical driver of smallholder productivity and household food security in South Africa, yet rural communities in the Eastern Cape continue to rely heavily on informal seed systems. Limited seed literacy among farmers and vendors is widely recognized as a constraint to the effective selection and use of high-quality seed. The purpose of this study is to assess seed literacy levels among smallholder farmers in KwaMkhiva village and evaluate how knowledge gaps shape farmers’ seed sourcing patterns and access to quality seed. The study hypothesizes that low seed literacy significantly increases reliance on informal seed systems and reduces adoption of certified or improved varieties. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from 50 smallholder farmers and 12 informal seedling vendors, complemented by semi-structured interviews with three extension officers. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, correlation analysis, and a composite Seed Literacy Index (SLI) were employed to assess literacy dimensions and their association with seed choices. Findings show that 49% of farmers rely on local markets and 40% use farm-saved seed, with 75% assessing quality visually rather than through germination or varietal indicators. Only 10% had received any seed-related training, and awareness of seed adaptability and crop rotation was below 20%. Higher SLI scores were positively associated with adoption of certified seed ( r = 0.42, p < 0.01) and crop diversification. The study concludes that seed literacy is a critical yet underserved capability that shapes smallholder seed access within dual seed economies. Strengthening farmer-centred seed literacy programmes, revitalising extension services, and supporting community seed banks could enhance access to quality seed and improve smallholder resilience.
Suggested Citation
Walter Shiba & Mankaba Whitney Matli & Ntanda Gqutyana & Portia Mdwebi & Nomfundo Magagula & Siphe Zantsi & Michael Bairu, 2026.
"Seed Literacy and Access to Quality Seeds Among Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A Case Study of KwaMkhiva Village,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2835-:d:1892761
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2835-:d:1892761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.