Author
Listed:
- Juan Su
(School of Economics and Management, Qingdao Institute of Technology, Jiaozhou 266300, China)
- Tong Shen
(School of Art and Design, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)
- Fuli Tang
(School of Economics and Management, Qingdao Institute of Technology, Jiaozhou 266300, China)
- Xue You
(School of Economics and Management, Qingdao Institute of Technology, Jiaozhou 266300, China)
- Qingling He
(School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Xiaojuan Lu
(School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Yikang Li
(School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
- Shenglin Luo
(School of Traffic and Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
Abstract
The effective recognition of risky driving behaviors holds technical potential for supporting accident prevention and sustainable transportation. However, existing intelligent algorithms for optimizing deep learning models in this field often suffer from slow convergence and high errors. This study proposes a novel hybrid model (ICPO-XGBoost) for risky driving behavior classification. The improved crested porcupine optimizer (ICPO) was developed using logistic-tent composite mapping for population initialization, a hybrid mechanism combining refraction opposition-based learning and Cauchy mutation to avoid local optima, and an adaptive variable spiral search with inertia weight to balance global and local search. The ICPO was then employed to optimize the hyperparameters of the XGBoost classifier. The ICPO demonstrated superior optimization accuracy and convergence speed compared to benchmark algorithms. The ICPO-XGBoost model achieved accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores of 96.2%, 95.4%, 95.8%, and 95.6%, respectively, for classifying and identifying risky driving behaviors. Compared to various benchmark models, these results represent increases of 12.7–24.8%, 14.8–31.8%, 14.9–31.0%, and 15.0–32.4%, respectively. For specific driving behavior categories (normal driving, slow driving, short-distance tailgating, sudden acceleration/deceleration, frequent lane changing, and forced lane changing), the precision, recall, and F1 scores of the ICPO-XGBoost model fell within the ranges of 84.8–99.2%, 87.5–100.0%, and 86.2–99.2%, respectively. Compared to benchmark models, these metrics show increases of 1.5–75.8%, 5.8–68.1%, and 3.3–72.6%, respectively. Notably, the model significantly improved accuracy in identifying sudden acceleration/deceleration behaviors. The results of this model facilitate the classification and early warning of risky driving behaviors, thereby reducing the frequency of such behaviors, lowering the risk of traffic accidents, and enhancing road traffic safety.
Suggested Citation
Juan Su & Tong Shen & Fuli Tang & Xue You & Qingling He & Xiaojuan Lu & Yikang Li & Shenglin Luo, 2026.
"Recognizing Risk Driving Behaviors with an Improved Crested Porcupine Optimizer and XGBoost,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-24, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2804-:d:1892056
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2804-:d:1892056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.