Author
Listed:
- Wei Li
(School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
- Shan Zhang
(School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
- Zhihao Wang
(College of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
- Shizheng Tan
(School of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
Abstract
Prior research on tour guides’ influence on tourists’ pro-environmental behavior has largely emphasized informational content (e.g., interpretation) and communication tactics (e.g., humor), while leaving the social-influence role of guides’ emotional displays underexamined, especially with respect to simultaneous affective and cognitive mechanisms. Drawing on Emotions-as-Social-Information (EASI) theory, we develop a dual-path model in which tour guides’ environmental passion affects tourists’ pro-environmental behavior via an affective-reaction pathway (positive emotions) and an inferential pathway (self-protection motivation), with tourists’ self-construal moderating the first-stage effects. Using a seven-day experience sampling (intensive longitudinal) survey (873 day-level observations nested within 159 tourists) and estimating a 1-1-1 multilevel structural equation model with Monte Carlo confidence intervals, we find that guides’ environmental passion predicts tourists’ pro-environmental behavior both directly and indirectly through the two mediators, and these indirect effects are stronger among tourists with a more interdependent self-construal. The study extends EASI theory to guide–tourist interactions and advances tourism sustainability research by clarifying how emotional displays operate as social information in shaping tourists’ daily pro-environmental responses.
Suggested Citation
Wei Li & Shan Zhang & Zhihao Wang & Shizheng Tan, 2026.
"Emotion or Cognition: How Tour Guides’ Environmental Passion Drives Tourists’ Pro-Environmental Behavior,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-21, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2779-:d:1891766
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2779-:d:1891766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.