IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2776-d1891732.html

Effects of Litter Mulch Type and Coverage Amount on Slope Runoff and Sediment Yield in Simulated Rainfall

Author

Listed:
  • Shao-Ping Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Hao Wan

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Yu-Han Liu

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Yun-Yi Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Wan-Qing Li

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

  • Yao Li

    (Hubei Provincial Road & Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430100, China)

  • Shang-Ge Liu

    (China Gezhouba Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430030, China)

  • Kun Fang

    (School of Mines, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Aksu Research Institute of Coal Resource, Aksu 842300, China)

  • Yuan-Hai Yang

    (Key Laboratory of Intelligent Health Perception and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes, Ministry of Education, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

Abstract

Soil erosion poses a significant threat to slope stability and ecological functionality. The litter layer, with its complex physical structure, enhances surface roughness, mitigates direct rainfall impact, and improves rainwater interception and soil retention. A litter of three typical slope-protection plant species from Wuhan, Hubei Province, China ( Cynodon dactylon , Indigofera amblyantha , and Cinnamomum camphora ) was selected for this experiment. This study quantified the effects of litter mulch at four coverage levels (0, 500, 800, and 1000 g/m 2 based on dry mass) on slope runoff and sediment yield under simulated rainfall conditions at an intensity of 60 mm/h for a duration of one hour. The results indicated that (1) all litter types and coverage amounts effectively delayed the initiation of slope runoff, though their efficiencies in runoff and sediment reduction varied significantly. (2) Compared with the bare slope, the sediment yield in the plots covered with litter from Cynodon dactylon , Cinnamomum camphora , and Indigofera amblyantha decreased by 96.5%, 67.5%, and 9.4%, respectively, at a coverage of 800 g/m 2 . Runoff yield decreased by 56.9% and 29.7% in the plots covered with Cynodon dactylon and Cinnamomum camphora litter, whereas Indigofera amblyantha litter cover instead increased runoff yield by 31.6%. (3) Furthermore, increasing litter coverage from 500 to 1000 g/m 2 progressively reduced runoff by 29% to 84% and sediment yield by 27.3% to 93.6% compared to the bare slope. These findings demonstrate the importance of litter cover in reducing runoff and soil erosion, offering quantitative support for optimizing vegetation-based slope management.

Suggested Citation

  • Shao-Ping Huang & Hao Wan & Yu-Han Liu & Yun-Yi Xu & Wan-Qing Li & Yao Li & Shang-Ge Liu & Kun Fang & Yuan-Hai Yang, 2026. "Effects of Litter Mulch Type and Coverage Amount on Slope Runoff and Sediment Yield in Simulated Rainfall," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2776-:d:1891732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2776-:d:1891732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.