Quantifying the Relationship Between Blue–Green Landscape Spatial Patterns and Carbon Storage: A Case Study of theZhengzhou Metropolitan Area

Against the backdrop of global warming and the urgent demand for sustainable development, blue–green spaces (BGSs) play a vital role in carbon reduction and sequestration, yet the multi-scale spatial mechanisms by which blue–green space patterns (BGSPs) regulate carbon storage (CS) remain unclear. Taking the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area as the study area, this research clarifies the BGSP-CS correlations at both class and landscape levels and quantifies their spatial interaction mechanisms, providing scientific support for integrated BGS planning that aligns with sustainable development objectives. Using the InVEST model coupled with regional carbon density correction, the total CS of the area is estimated at 1112.27 × 10 6 t. Spearman’s correlation analysis shows that at the class level, area–edge and shape complexity indicators (e.g., Landscape Shape Index, LSI: r = −0.427) are negatively correlated with CS, while connectivity indicators exert no significant effect. At the landscape level, Shannon’s Diversity Index (SHDI: r = −0.635) and area–edge indicators inhibit CS, whereas Shannon’s Evenness Index (SHEI: r = 0.602), Largest Patch Index (LPI: r = 0.618) and shape complexity indicators exert positive effects. A comparative analysis of three regression models reveals that the multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) model outperforms the ordinary least squares (OLS) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models, with R 2 values of 0.505 (class level) and 0.484 (landscape level). It effectively captures the “west–strong and east–weak” spatial heterogeneity of BGSP impacts on CS. This study identifies key BGSP indicators regulating CS and their spatial mechanisms, providing scientific support for integrated BGS planning, regional carbon sink enhancement, the achievement of “dual carbon” goals, and the promotion of sustainable development in metropolitan areas. Future research may optimize model parameters through field surveys and explore the coupling mechanism between BGSPs, land surface temperature and CS to better align BGS management with sustainable development agendas.