Author
Listed:
- Pablo Rituay
(Proyecto Mejoramiento del Sistema de Información Estadística Agraria y del Servicio de Información Agraria para el Desarrollo Rural del Perú (PIADER), Unidad Ejecutora de Gestión de Proyectos Sectoriales (UEGPS), Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego del Perú, Lima 15047, Peru)
- Carlos Aldea
(Instituto de Investigación en Negocios Agropecuarios, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)
- Jose Otoya-Barrenechea
(Proyecto Mejoramiento del Sistema de Información Estadística Agraria y del Servicio de Información Agraria para el Desarrollo Rural del Perú (PIADER), Unidad Ejecutora de Gestión de Proyectos Sectoriales (UEGPS), Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego del Perú, Lima 15047, Peru)
- María Adita Tolentino Soriano
(Proyecto Mejoramiento del Sistema de Información Estadística Agraria y del Servicio de Información Agraria para el Desarrollo Rural del Perú (PIADER), Unidad Ejecutora de Gestión de Proyectos Sectoriales (UEGPS), Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario y Riego del Perú, Lima 15047, Peru)
- Ligia García
(Instituto de Investigación en Negocios Agropecuarios, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)
- Jonathan-Alberto Campos Trigoso
(Instituto de Investigación en Negocios Agropecuarios, Facultad de Ingeniería Zootecnista, Biotecnología, Agronegocios y Ciencia de Datos, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas, Chachapoyas 01001, Peru)
Abstract
This paper examines the role of agricultural credit in shaping farm performance and technology-related outcomes in Peru, using nationally representative microdata from the Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria (ENA). In a context characterized by credit rationing and institutional constraints, access to finance may influence agricultural income, productivity, and the adoption of improved practices through multiple direct and indirect channels. To address the non-random allocation of credit, the analysis employs a quasi-experimental framework that combines propensity score trimming, block-based common support restrictions, entropy balancing, and doubly robust treatment-effect estimators (IPWRA and AIPW). Descriptive evidence documents substantial heterogeneity in credit sources, loan uses, and rejection reasons, highlighting structural barriers related to collateral, land tenure, and risk. Regression results on the balanced sample indicate positive and statistically significant associations between credit access and both real agricultural income and land productivity. However, estimated treatment effects are sensitive to the estimation strategy: while IPWRA estimates suggest economically meaningful gains among credit recipients, AIPW estimates are smaller and not always statistically distinguishable from zero. Exploratory results further suggest that credit access is positively associated with technology adoption and managerial capacity, consistent with, but not identifying, a potential association between credit approval and technological practices. Overall, the findings are consistent with a growing body of evidence showing that the impacts of agricultural credit are modest, heterogeneous, and context dependent. From a sustainability perspective, the results underscore the importance of complementary interventions—such as land tenure security, risk management instruments, and tailored financial services—in enhancing the effectiveness of rural credit programs in agricultural systems characterized by imperfect markets and high production risk.
Suggested Citation
Pablo Rituay & Carlos Aldea & Jose Otoya-Barrenechea & María Adita Tolentino Soriano & Ligia García & Jonathan-Alberto Campos Trigoso, 2026.
"Agricultural Credit, Farm Performance and Technology Adoption Under Credit Rationing in Peru,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-30, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2761-:d:1891287
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2761-:d:1891287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.