IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i6p2757-d1891211.html

Beekeeping Regulation in Chile: A Case Study on Gaps, Opportunities, and Challenges for Honey Bee Protection

Author

Listed:
  • Evelin Troncoso

    (Doctorado en Conservación y Gestión de la Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomás, Santiago 8370003, Chile
    Bachillerato en Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 7591538, Chile
    Centro de Investigación Austral Biotech, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomás, Valdivia 5090000, Chile)

  • Rodrigo A. Estévez

    (Centro de Investigación e Innovación para el Cambio Climático, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomás, Santiago 8370003, Chile)

  • Marisol Vargas

    (Laboratorios de Virología y Patologías en Abejas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Concepción, Chillán 3780000, Chile)

  • Nolberto Arismendi

    (Centro de Investigación Austral Biotech, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomás, Valdivia 5090000, Chile)

Abstract

Agricultural intensification and the widespread use of pesticides have exerted long-term pressures on honey bees, negatively affecting their survival, abundance, and immunity. Understanding the perceptions of beekeepers and farmers is essential to identify collaborative actions and assess whether existing regulations provide adequate protection for bee health. Laws and regulations play a crucial role in managing apicultural health risks; however, their effectiveness depends on how well they align with ecological realities and policy objectives. This study investigates whether Chile’s regulatory frameworks provide sufficient protection for honey bees by identifying key gaps and opportunities, particularly regarding pesticide use in agriculture. A mixed-methods analysis was applied to a sample of beekeepers from southern Chile—considering variables such as gender, education level, and regulatory awareness—and complemented with a review of legal documents and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Findings show that although Law No. 21,489 represents an important step toward formalizing beekeeping and reducing pesticide-related risks, its scope remains limited by weak enforcement capacity, scarce institutional resources, and insufficient regulation of systemic pesticides. Strengthening environmental governance and updating the regulatory framework through greater inter-institutional coordination, beekeeper participation, and effective control mechanisms are essential to reconcile agricultural production with pollinator conservation and ecosystem sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelin Troncoso & Rodrigo A. Estévez & Marisol Vargas & Nolberto Arismendi, 2026. "Beekeeping Regulation in Chile: A Case Study on Gaps, Opportunities, and Challenges for Honey Bee Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2757-:d:1891211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2757/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/6/2757/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2757-:d:1891211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.