Author
Listed:
- Jie Wang
(College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Haiyang Zhang
(College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Runbin Hu
(College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Yixuan Zhou
(College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
Abstract
Coastal provinces in eastern China are experiencing rapid urbanization that challenges ecosystem services and low-carbon development. In this study, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Guangdong Provinces were selected, and the influence of land use/land cover change (LUCC) on carbon storage and its spatial heterogeneity was quantified. LUCC datasets for 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020 were compiled to describe land-use dynamics over 2000–2020. Carbon storage was estimated with the InVEST model. Land-use patterns for 2035 were simulated using the PLUS model under three scenarios: natural development, ecological protection, and development priority. Spatial autocorrelation analysis and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) were then used to determine the key drivers of spatial variability in carbon storage. Between 2000 and 2020, farmland, forest, grassland, and unused land showed an overall decline, while water bodies and tt-up land expanded; together, these changes corresponded to a carbon-storage loss of 121.19 Tg. Carbon density exhibited pronounced spatial clustering, with higher values concentrated in mountainous and less urbanized areas; built-up expansion and forest degradation were the primary contributors to carbon loss. By 2035, total carbon storage is projected to decrease by 74.67 Tg under natural development and by 108.54 Tg under development priority, whereas ecological protection is projected to yield the smallest decline (35.71 Tg). These results underscore the importance of sustainable coastal land-use planning and integrated coastal zone management, which balance development and ecosystem services by prioritizing ecological protection, curbing built-up expansion, and promoting forest restoration. Such nature-based solutions can enhance carbon sequestration, strengthen climate resilience, and support China’s low-carbon transition toward its dual-carbon targets.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:6:p:2670-:d:1889506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.