IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2627-d1882005.html

A Systematic Literature Review of Electric Arc Furnace and Ladle Furnace Slag for Pavement Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Taísa Menezes Medina

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68508, USA)

  • Jamilla Emi Sudo Lutif Teixeira

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68508, USA)

  • Isabella Madeira Bueno

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68508, USA)

Abstract

This study aims to systematically synthesize and critically evaluate the characteristics of electric arc furnace slag (EAFS) and ladle furnace slag (LFS) when applied as an alternative paving material. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA methodology, with research published between 2000 and 2024. Three major databases were searched, considering only Q1–Q2 and English articles. After independent, blinded screening by two reviewers, a total of 177 papers met the selection criteria. The results were qualitatively synthesized through bibliometric analysis, slag characteristics, and application type. Results show that asphalt concrete (AC) is the most common application of EAFS, representing 61% of studies, with many studies exploring 100% substitution of natural aggregates. Overall, EAFS and LFS demonstrate favorable mechanical properties, including high toughness, hardness, and adequate soundness, largely attributed to their iron-rich composition, supporting their use in base layers, AC, and Portland cement concrete (PCC). However, significant chemical and mineralogical variability influences swelling potential and reactivity, highlighting the need for case-specific characterization. While swelling concerns limit its use as an unbound base material, these issues are reduced when EAFS and LFS are used as a soil binder or encapsulated within AC or PCC matrices. Environmental assessments show that most EAFS and LFS samples meet the regulatory thresholds for their respective local leaching limits, though behavior varies with steel type (low-alloy vs. stainless), particle size and pH. Significant gaps remain in long-term performance and testing standards. This review proposes guidelines for selecting appropriate tests according to the intended pavement application, aiming to facilitate the safe and effective use of EAFS and LFS in road infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Taísa Menezes Medina & Jamilla Emi Sudo Lutif Teixeira & Isabella Madeira Bueno, 2026. "A Systematic Literature Review of Electric Arc Furnace and Ladle Furnace Slag for Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-40, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2627-:d:1882005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2627-:d:1882005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.