IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2592-d1881295.html

Fly Ash and Bottom Ash from Biomass and Coal: Comparison of Properties in Grate and Fluidized Bed Combustion from the Perspective of Construction Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Karolína Králová

    (Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petr Formáček

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 36 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Martina Šídlová

    (Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Rostislav Šulc

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 36 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Mauermann

    (Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Klára Betáková

    (Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Konvalinka

    (Department of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 36 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The cement industry seeks alternative raw materials to lower its environmental impact, and biomass ash represents a potential material for construction applications. This study evaluates biomass ashes (BMA) produced from grate and fluidized bed combustion, as well as co-combustion with coal, focusing on their chemical, mineralogical, and physical characteristics. The results reveal a substantial variability in BMA composition, influenced primarily by the fuel type and combustion method. This heterogeneity critically affects the reactivity and overall suitability of the BMA for use in construction materials. It was found that none of the 23 analyzed samples met the requirements of EN 450-1. This outcome is largely attributable to the combustion process and to sampling from the bottom part of the boiler, which typically yields material with properties outside the limits of the standard. Even when assessed directly against the specific limit values of EN 450-1, the ashes did not comply without further processing or modification. Despite these limitations, BMA show potential for use in accordance with EN 197-1, which permits the incorporation of up to 5 wt.% minor additional constituents. However, their practical application under this framework requires validation through tests performed on hydrated cement. These findings underline both the limitations and the promise of BMA as a supplementary cementitious material (SCMs) in sustainable construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Karolína Králová & Petr Formáček & Martina Šídlová & Rostislav Šulc & Lukáš Mauermann & Klára Betáková & Jan Konvalinka, 2026. "Fly Ash and Bottom Ash from Biomass and Coal: Comparison of Properties in Grate and Fluidized Bed Combustion from the Perspective of Construction Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2592-:d:1881295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2592/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2592/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2592-:d:1881295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.