Author
Listed:
- Bishala Maerdan
(Higher School of Economics and Business, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)
- Saule Zeinolla
(Faculty of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kazakh-German University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)
- Lazat Spankulova
(Department of Recreational Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)
- Diyar Omarov
(Faculty of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kazakh-German University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)
- Assel Azhibayeva
(Faculty of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kazakh-German University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between ESG governance maturity and market valuation in the context of Kazakhstan. The analysis is based on a balanced panel of 13 listed companies covering the period 2019–2024. Firm value was measured using Tobin’s Q coefficient, and ESG maturity was assessed using a specific index that describes the extent to which environmental, social, and governance practices are institutionally embedded within an organization. The results of the fixed-effects model suggest that there is a positive relationship between the aggregate ESG score and a firm’s market value, but it is not statistically significant. When considering the sectoral breakdown, a difference is observed: ESG maturity is positively and significantly associated with market valuation for companies in the financial sector, while no such relationship was found for the non-financial sector. No significant relationship was found between ESG maturity and return on equity (ROE). The results obtained show that the impact of ESG factors in the case of Kazakhstan is not equally visible in all sectors and that, at the present stage, its influence is mainly more pronounced in the financial sector.
Suggested Citation
Bishala Maerdan & Saule Zeinolla & Lazat Spankulova & Diyar Omarov & Assel Azhibayeva, 2026.
"ESG Maturity and Firm Valuation in an Emerging Market: Evidence of Sectoral Heterogeneity,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2583-:d:1881182
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2583-:d:1881182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.