IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2564-d1879113.html

Research on Intergovernmental Collaboration Mechanisms in Rural Water Environmental Governance Based on Complex Network Evolutionary Game

Author

Listed:
  • Guanghua Dong

    (School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Xin Li

    (School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Yaru Zhang

    (School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

Abstract

The governance of the rural water environment is essential for improving the quality of life of rural residents and advancing the construction of ecological civilization. However, the current governance system faces issues such as fragmented governance entities and low collaborative efficiency. Therefore, in this study, we focus on the intergovernmental collaborative governance mechanism for rural water environments. Drawing on complex network theory and evolutionary game theory, we employ complex network analysis and construct a complex network evolutionary game model among government departments, and we further conduct numerical simulations to examine the evolutionary dynamics of intergovernmental collaboration in rural water environmental governance. The findings show the following: (1) The reward and punishment mechanism, collaborative gain coefficient, and loss intensification trend coefficient all positively influence the participation rates of local governments. When these parameters exceed certain thresholds, they can rapidly and stably increase the proportion of participating nodes. (2) Nodes with stronger environmental preferences respond more directly to the collaborative gain coefficient, while the loss intensification trend coefficient promotes cooperation by amplifying the cost of non-cooperation. (3) The heterogeneity in economic preferences of local governments affects the stability of cooperation. Governments with stronger environmental priorities are more inclined to form the core of cooperation, whereas those driven by stronger economic priorities are more vulnerable to parameter fluctuations, leading to instability in overall participation levels. Reducing or eliminating this heterogeneity can improve both participation rates and the stability of cooperation. These findings offer theoretical support for designing intergovernmental collaborative governance mechanisms for rural water environments and provide practical guidance for calibrating reward–punishment schemes, identifying key coordinating departments, and stabilizing cross-departmental participation, thereby facilitating an efficient transition in rural water environmental governance models.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanghua Dong & Xin Li & Yaru Zhang, 2026. "Research on Intergovernmental Collaboration Mechanisms in Rural Water Environmental Governance Based on Complex Network Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-46, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2564-:d:1879113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2564/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2564/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2564-:d:1879113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.