Author
Listed:
- Yue Wen
(School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)
- Benfu Lv
(School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)
- Jie Liu
(School of political and economic management, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang 550004, China)
Abstract
Work engagement is pivotal for service quality and the long-term viability of platform businesses, yet its micro-level drivers remain insufficiently understood in algorithmically managed gig work. Drawing on self-regulation, social exchange, organizational justice, and algorithmic governance perspectives, this study develops an integrative framework linking workers’ self-management, perceived organizational support, organizational justice, and perceived algorithmic control to work engagement. We surveyed 292 platform-based gig workers in China using an online questionnaire. Hierarchical regressions and robustness checks using structural equation models show that all four antecedents are positively associated with engagement; when considered jointly, perceived algorithmic control, organizational support, and organizational justice remain significant, whereas the incremental association of self-management becomes weaker. Facet-level analyses further indicate that self-improvement is the key self-management mechanism; supervisor, coworker, and climate support all contribute; distributive, procedural, and interactional justice are all positively associated; and the algorithmic process and outcome control matter more than perceived task discretion. The findings highlight actionable levers for social sustainability and decent work in the platform economy, including strengthening developmental opportunities, institutionalizing fair and contestable governance, and improving the transparency and predictability of algorithmic decisions.
Suggested Citation
Yue Wen & Benfu Lv & Jie Liu, 2026.
"Enhancing Work Engagement in the Gig Economy: Evidence from Platform Workers,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2501-:d:1877881
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2501-:d:1877881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.