Author
Listed:
- Yuanyuan Meng
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
- Aihua Long
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
- Wenhao Li
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China
Key Laboratory of Modern Water-Saving Irrigation of Xinjiang Production & Construction Group, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)
- Xuan Liang
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)
- Cai Ren
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)
- Wenjun Wang
(College of Water Conservancy & Architectural Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China)
Abstract
Agricultural water footprint is an important indicator for assessing water-use efficiency and resource carrying capacity in agricultural systems, especially in arid regions. From the perspective of ecological function zones, this study examines the spatiotemporal dynamics of the agricultural water footprint in Xinjiang, China, and evaluates its adaptability to socioeconomic factors. The blue and green water footprints of crop production and the water footprint of animal products during 2000–2020 were quantified to estimate the total agricultural water footprint. The Gini coefficient and imbalance index were used to quantitatively evaluate the spatial adaptability between the agricultural water footprint and socioeconomic factors, including sown area, population, and agricultural Gross Domestic Product (GDP) across different ecological function zones. The results indicate that the agricultural water footprint increased from 2.54 × 10 10 m 3 to 5.85 × 10 10 m 3 , with a clear spatial gradient characterized by higher values in southwestern Xinjiang and lower values in the northeastern region. Crop production accounted for more than 85% of the total footprint, with cotton as the dominant contributor, while beef consumption drove the growth in the animal product water footprint. The adaptability between the agricultural water footprint and sown area improved overall, whereas coordination with population distribution remained weak, and notable regional differences were observed in water footprint intensity relative to agricultural GDP. These findings indicate that the spatiotemporal differentiation of the agricultural water footprint is closely linked to resource endowments and development characteristics across ecological function zones, providing support for region-specific agricultural water management in arid areas.
Suggested Citation
Yuanyuan Meng & Aihua Long & Wenhao Li & Xuan Liang & Cai Ren & Wenjun Wang, 2026.
"Spatiotemporal Variations in the Agricultural Water Footprint and Its Socioeconomic Adaptability Across Ecological Function Zones in Xinjiang, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2476-:d:1877271
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2476-:d:1877271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.