Author
Listed:
- Gita Bhushal
(Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA)
- Pankaj Lal
(Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA
Clean Energy and Sustainability Analytics Center, Montclair State University, 150 Clove Road, Little Falls, NJ 07424, USA)
Abstract
Land use and land cover (LULC) change strongly influences national carbon dynamics and the effectiveness of forest-based climate mitigation strategies, particularly in mountainous developing countries. This study integrates scenario-based LULC modeling, spatially explicit carbon accounting, and economic valuation to assess how alternative development pathways affect carbon storage and its economic value in Nepal over the 2020–2050 period. LULC projections for four scenarios: Business-as-Usual (BAU), Rapid Urban Development (RUD), Forest Degradation and Terai Contraction (FDTC), and Agricultural Land Abandonment and Ecological Recovery (ALER), were generated using the TerrSet Land Change Modeler, with 2020 as the baseline. These projections were then used as inputs to the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) Carbon Storage and Sequestration model to estimate changes in ecosystem carbon stocks, integrating aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, soil organic carbon, and dead organic matter pools. Carbon stock changes were monetized using a constant carbon price of USD 5/tCO 2 e and a 3% discount rate to estimate net present values (NPV). Results reveal strong divergence across scenarios. National carbon storage remains near-neutral under BAU (−0.46% by 2050), declines under RUD (−2.42%) and FDTC (−5.32%), and increases substantially under ALER (+11.74%). These biophysical outcomes translate into contrasting economic values: BAU yields a small negative NPV, RUD and FDTC generate large discounted losses, and ALER produces a strongly positive NPV exceeding USD 800 million by 2050. Spatially, forest and other wooded land dominate national carbon dynamics, while urban expansion and forest degradation drive disproportionate losses. Overall, the study results demonstrate that recovery-oriented land-use pathways offer substantially greater long-term carbon and economic benefits than development trajectories dominated by urban expansion or forest degradation, providing a policy-relevant framework to support Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, together with conservation, sustainable forest management, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+) planning and long-term mitigation assessment in Nepal.
Suggested Citation
Gita Bhushal & Pankaj Lal, 2026.
"Scenario-Based Economic Valuation of Forest Carbon Sequestration in Nepal: Implications for REDD+ (2030–2050),"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-26, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2468-:d:1877201
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2468-:d:1877201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.