IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2429-d1876495.html

Evaluating Assertive Communication to Support Sustainable Online Teaching in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Brîndușa-Mariana Amălăncei

    (Department of Romanian Language and Literature and Communication Sciences, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, 600114 Bacău, Romania)

  • Katerina Tzafilkou

    (SMILE Lab, University of Macedonia, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Cristina Cîrtiță-Buzoianu

    (Department of Romanian Language and Literature and Communication Sciences, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, 600114 Bacău, Romania)

  • Liliana Mâță

    (Teacher Training Department, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, 600115 Bacău, Romania)

Abstract

Introduction: Assertive communication is a fundamental component of effective teaching, particularly in the context of the increasing shift toward online higher education. Despite its importance, there is a need for validated instruments specifically designed to assess assertive communication in online teaching environments. The present study aims to examine the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the Assertive Communication Scale in Online Teaching (ACSOT). Methods: The study involved 374 students from “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacău, Romania. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to investigate the factorial structure of the ACSOT. Correlational analyses were conducted to examine the relationships among the identified dimensions, and group differences were assessed by gender and age. Results: The exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure comprising expressiveness, communicativeness, and conflict management. Significant positive correlations were found among the three dimensions. Gender differences indicated that women demonstrated stronger conflict management skills than men. Age-related differences showed that older participants reported higher levels of assertive communication in terms of expressiveness and communicativeness compared to younger participants. Conclusions: The findings support the factorial validity of the ACSOT and suggest that the instrument is a reliable tool for assessing assertive communication in online teaching contexts. The identified gender and age differences underscore the importance of considering demographic variables when developing training programs designed to enhance assertive communication skills in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Brîndușa-Mariana Amălăncei & Katerina Tzafilkou & Cristina Cîrtiță-Buzoianu & Liliana Mâță, 2026. "Evaluating Assertive Communication to Support Sustainable Online Teaching in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2429-:d:1876495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2429-:d:1876495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.