IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2396-d1875958.html

Four-Decade Evolution of Ecological Quality in the Ji River Basin (1986–2024): A Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Nan

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China
    Key Laboratory of Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Gansu Province, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China)

  • Qiaorui Ba

    (Key Laboratory of Resource Utilization of Agricultural Solid Waste in Gansu Province, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China
    College of Bioengineering and Technology, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China)

  • Chengyong Wu

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China)

  • Qiang Liu

    (College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tianshui Normal University, Tianshui 741001, China)

Abstract

Long-term ecological monitoring is essential for sustainable management in fragile regions. This study assessed four decades (1986–2024) of ecological evolution in the Ji River Basin—a 1276.64 km 2 transitional loess–gully ecosystem in China’s Yellow River Basin—using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI). We integrated multi-temporal Landsat images via Google Earth Engine to construct a 40-year RSEI time series. The index couples greenness (NDVI), wetness (WET), heat (LST), and dryness (NDBSI) through principal component analysis, with PC1 explaining > 82% of the variance. Three evolutionary phases were identified: initial degradation (1986–1996), driven by slope cropland expansion; stabilization (1996–2006), coinciding with early ‘Grain for Green’ policies; and sustained recovery (2006–2024), characterized by the expansion of high-quality zones. We developed a novel resilience zoning framework integrating local spatial consistency, terrain constraints, and functional state (mean RSEI 2016–2024), which delineated three zones: high-resilience refugia (19.37%), moderate-resilience matrix (75.54%), and low-resilience corridors (5.09%). Mid-slope positions (TPI: 1.220–1.510) within moderate-resilience zones demonstrated optimal restoration efficiency, challenging conventional uniform approaches. The findings advocate spatially differentiated strategies—investing in transitional zones, retrofitting degraded corridors, and monitoring stable refugia—to advance the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 15 in semi-arid regions globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Nan & Qiaorui Ba & Chengyong Wu & Qiang Liu, 2026. "Four-Decade Evolution of Ecological Quality in the Ji River Basin (1986–2024): A Remote Sensing Ecological Index (RSEI) Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2396-:d:1875958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2396/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2396/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2396-:d:1875958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.