Author
Listed:
- Ling Zhang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China
Center for Human-Oriented Environment and Sustainable Design, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)
- Wenfeng Tang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)
- Diankun Jiang
(Shenzhen Key Research Base for Humanities and Social Sciences, National Image Research Center of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China)
Abstract
Given China’s increasingly severe population ageing, urban comprehensive parks are important places for older adults’ daily activities. Improving their quality directly affects the physical and mental health of older adults. Most previous studies have explored spatial optimisation strategies from a single dimension, focusing either on behaviour or on perception; studies on simultaneous improvements in behavioural and perceptual levels across functional space types remain limited. This study selects 40 activity spaces from four urban comprehensive parks in Shenzhen as samples. It systematically analyses differences in older adults’ behavioural patterns and perceptual experiences across six types of functional spaces. Based on the results, a comprehensive behaviour–perception evaluation model is developed to identify optimisation priorities for different space types. Furthermore, generalised linear regression models are employed to explore the relationships between environmental elements and older adults’ behaviours and perceptions, from which targeted optimisation strategies are derived. First, significant differences are observed among six functional space types in older adults’ concentrated leisure behaviour, dispersed exercise behaviour, concentrated exercise behaviour, and safety, while the remaining indicators are relatively balanced. Second, the evaluation model classifies the 40 samples into four space types, including high behavioural level–high perceptual level, high behavioural level–low perceptual level, low behavioural level–high perceptual level, and low behavioural level–low perceptual level. Third, 12 environmental elements, including area, degree of greenery, and leisure facilities, are associated with older adults’ behavioural and perceptual levels in urban comprehensive parks. Fourth, optimisation strategies are proposed for problem spaces with low behavioural or perceptual levels across the six functional space types, including behavioural strategies such as expanding activity spaces and avoiding excessive plant density, as well as perceptual strategies such as improving plant landscape layering and balancing spatial colour combinations. This study develops a quantitative evaluation and spatial optimisation framework guided by older adults’ behaviour and perception, providing theoretical support and practical insights for the sustainable improvement of urban comprehensive park quality.
Suggested Citation
Ling Zhang & Wenfeng Tang & Diankun Jiang, 2026.
"Evaluation and Optimization of Activity Spaces in Urban Comprehensive Parks in Shenzhen Based on Older Adults’ Behaviour and Perception,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2345-:d:1874552
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2345-:d:1874552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.