Author
Listed:
- Liping Sun
(School of Architecture and Art Design, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China)
- Panpan Yan
(School of Architecture and Art Design, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China)
- Lanbei Li
(School of Architecture and Art Design, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China)
Abstract
As a pivotal hub for the northward advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative and a strategic outpost for national security, the spatial patterns of towns in the border regions of northern Inner Mongolia exert a direct impact on the region’s sustainable development and long-term prosperity. This study focuses on 141 border towns situated along the Inner Mongolia stretch of China’s northern border. By leveraging analytical tools including kernel density analysis, standard deviation ellipse method, and nearest neighbor index analysis, it explores the distinctive characteristics of their spatial distribution. Furthermore, this study applies the Geodetector method to quantify the explanatory power of key influencing factors on the spatial differentiation of these border towns. The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) The border towns along the Inner Mongolia stretch of the northern border displayed a distinct heterogeneous distribution gradient characterized by prominent regional agglomeration and formed a three-tier spatial hierarchy. Specifically, the Bayannur–Hetao Plain Town Cluster served as the primary agglomeration core, supplemented by two secondary clusters, namely the Xing’an League–Southern Greater Khingan Range Town Cluster and the Hulunbuir–Border Port Town Cluster. In contrast, the Alxa League constituted a low-density peripheral belt with sparse town distribution. (2) Factor analysis via Geodetector revealed that the spatial distribution pattern of these border towns was primarily driven by the core mechanism of port-led urbanization. This core driver was synergistically reinforced by secondary factors such as mineral resource endowments, jointly shaping a complex spatial layout that partially transcended natural geographical constraints—a stark contrast to coastal ports, where development is dominated by innate natural geographic advantages.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2339-:d:1874495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.