IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i5p2302-d1873363.html

Sustainability and Compliance in Organic Food Industries: A Comparative Study of India and Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Aparna P. Murali

    (Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Danuta Kolożyn-Krajewska

    (Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
    Faculty of Science & Technology, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Roberto Mancinelli

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia (UNITUS), Via S. Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Rosario Muleo

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia (UNITUS), Via S. Camillo De Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Surya Sasikumar Nair

    (Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Joanna Trafiałek

    (Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Food safety, quality management, and ecologically conscious practices must be successfully integrated throughout supply chains to guarantee the sustainability of organic food systems. There is little empirical data on how these factors interact in various institutional and regulatory contexts, despite the growing significance of the organic sector for sustainable food transitions. This study examines sustainability-focused compliance procedures in Italian and Indian organic food processing businesses. A systematic questionnaire was used to gather primary data from 300 certified organic businesses (150 per nation), and non-parametric statistical methods were used to examine firm-size and cross-country variations. The results show notable differences between the two contexts in terms of food safety rules and sustainability performance. Because of a more developed regulatory framework and more robust enforcement mechanisms, Italian businesses demonstrate greater and more consistent sustainability performance. On the other hand, Indian businesses, especially small ones, show more unpredictability, which suggests that they have limited ability to implement sustainable practices and environmental management. The performance of quality management systems in both nations is similar, indicating the contribution of international certification standards to the harmonisation of quality governance. In contrast to Italy, where they operate as separate operational domains, correlation research shows that sustainability, food safety rules, and quality management are more closely interwoven in Indian businesses. The study emphasises the importance of the company’s size and the regulatory environment in determining how sustainability is integrated into organic food chains. The findings present beneficial guidance for small and medium-sized businesses by highlighting important areas where targeted capacity building and regulatory assistance can improve sustainability and compliance performance and it is one of the first enterprise-level empirical evaluations of food safety rules, quality management, and sustainability in organic food processing across different regulatory contexts. The findings provide actionable insights for small organic processors by highlighting priority areas for targeted regulatory support, technical help, and capacity building to improve the incorporation of sustainability practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Aparna P. Murali & Danuta Kolożyn-Krajewska & Roberto Mancinelli & Rosario Muleo & Surya Sasikumar Nair & Joanna Trafiałek, 2026. "Sustainability and Compliance in Organic Food Industries: A Comparative Study of India and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2302-:d:1873363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2302/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/5/2302/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:5:p:2302-:d:1873363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.